“It is very unusual for us to find that all of a sudden everything gets dark for a period of seven hours in terms of monitoring the president’s movements and conversations,” Ruskin said. The story goes on under the ad Asked if the gap could be due to incompetence rather than conspiracy, Ruskin said the commission had taken that into account. He added, however, that “the gaps are suspiciously adapted to the heart of the matter” on January 6, including when several lawmakers later said they were asking Trump to intervene. Ruskin noted that the committee was aware that the chairman was involved in calls during that period, “but we do not have a comprehensive, detailed picture of what was happening during that period, and that is obviously strong for us.” The story goes on under the ad On October 8, White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki confirmed a plan to approve documents related to President Donald Trump’s communications on January 6. (Video: The Washington Post, Photo: The Washington Post) Earlier this year, the National Archives and Records Service handed over to the committee 11 pages of White House records from that day, including the president’s official daily diary and the White House distribution log. The story goes on under the ad Ruskin added that the commission’s mission is to get a “complete picture” of what happened on January 6, as well as what needs to be done “to strengthen democratic institutions and processes against future uprisings and coups and destabilization attempts.” and overthrow our elections. “ Ruskin said he hoped the commission would begin public hearings in May and was looking for links between the violent Capitol uprising and what he called a “coup d’etat” orchestrated by Trump against the Constitution. “I feel confident that we will be able to tell this story,” Ruskin said, adding, “Obviously, we are facing a lot of obstacles now.” On March 28, the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol voted in favor of the charges against former Trump aides Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino Jr. (Video: The Washington Post, Photo: Jabin Botsford / The Washington Post) Last week, the commission voted to retain two more former Trump aides – former Commerce and Construction Director Peter Navarro and former communications chief Daniel Scavino Jr. – in criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with the committee’s calls. Ruskin said that Parliament is likely to vote this week on whether to refer Navarro and Scavino to the Justice Department for prosecution. The story goes on under the ad Like Trump and a number of other former aides, Navarro and Scavino have argued that they are protected by executive privilege and that the summonses were exceeded by the commission. He is one of the most recent high-profile Trump White House officials facing repercussions for refusing to comply with the January 6 committee summons. Mark Meadows, a former Trump White House chief of staff, also refused to work with the committee, leading to a vote in Congress to scorn Congress in December. A federal judge ruled on March 28 that then-President Donald Trump “most likely than not” committed federal crimes in an attempt to overthrow the 2020 election. (Video: Reuters, Photo: Reuters) The story goes on under the ad Asked about the judge’s comments on Sunday, Senator Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Who has often defended Trump and voted to acquit Trump in his referral trials, was unbound. “Well, federal judges say a lot of things and we’ll see how that goes through the process,” Blunt told ABC News’ This Week. “I believe that the Ministry of Justice has a job to do and should do so, and those who participated in the planning or execution of illegal activities on January 6 should be prosecuted.” Bob Woodward and Robert Costa contributed to this report.
