The Alabama Republican’s admission that the former president had urged him to overthrow the 2020 election, including in the months following the Russian rocket attacks on the western Ukrainian city of Lviv, what will the dictators think? Biden proposing a minimum tax on billionaires in the budget MORE took office, he could add to the commission’s attempt to show that Trump is involved in criminal behavior while trying to stay in power.
On Wednesday, Trump canceled his support for the Books, which is vying for an open seat in the Senate in this year ‘s Republican primary.
In response, the MP made the outstanding claim that the former president was pressuring him to “cancel” the 2020 elections even after the change of hands by the White House.
“President Trump has asked me to cancel the 2020 election, to remove Joe Biden from the White House immediately, to immediately reinstate President Trump in the White House, and to hold new special presidential elections,” Brooks said in a statement. Wednesday. “As a lawyer, I have repeatedly told President Trump that January 6 was the final verdict in the election and that neither the US Constitution nor the US Code allows what President Trump is asking for. Period.”
In later comments in various media outlets, Brooks said that Trump made such requests only in September last year.
The Alabama lawmaker made the claim Wednesday after a sudden rift between him and Trump over a dispute over whether to urge voters to step down from the 2020 campaign.
His remarks marked the first time one of Trump’s allies had accused the former president of inciting illegal actions to restore his presidency.
The revelation adds a new dimension to the aftermath of the Capitol uprising, as Trump continued his efforts to overthrow the election long after stepping down.
Experts say any attempt to overturn the election at that point could not be considered legitimate.
“There is no way to overthrow the elections today. And special elections – I mean, they are not in the statute. It is not in the Constitution. “I do not know where this would come from,” said Neil Eggleston, who served as a White House adviser to former President Barack Hussein Obama. The Clinton and Psaki cases show the continuing threat of COVID-19MORE and as an investigator in the select committee of Parliament that is investigating the Iran-Contra scandal.
“As I think Mr. Brooks said he said to the President, the issue ended on January 6, when Congress ratified the election,” Eggleston said. “In my opinion, it ended in December, when all the states reported their voters, and what happened on January 6 was typical. “But it ended on January 6.”
It is unclear whether the selection committee will continue Brooks’ allegations in its investigation. A panel representative did not respond when asked for comment.
But Brooks’s admission adds to the selection committee’s findings and could boost its investigation.
“It adds urgency to the January 6 committee’s work,” said Jessica Levinson, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University. He added that it fits in with a trend in the information that has come out about Trump’s efforts to stay in power.
“There is a well-documented campaign of pressure from the former president when it comes to federal officials, state officials, local officials trying to overturn the outcome of the 2020 election. But the evidence keeps coming.”
On Jan. 6, and in the weeks leading up to it, Brooks backed Trump’s efforts to overthrow the 2020 election.
And in the hours before the uprising, Brooks spoke to Trump supporters at the “Stop the Steal” rally, wearing armor, and urged the crowd to fight to undermine efforts to secure Biden victory.
“Today is the day that American patriots begin to drop names and kick their asses,” he said in a statement.
Brooks’ news comes as the selection committee intensifies its investigation, facing various legal challenges for its summonses.
The panel responded earlier this month to a lawsuit filed by Trump’s legal adviser, John Eastman, who challenged his summons, saying he had developed a “good faith” in believing that Trump was involved in criminal activities in his efforts to overthrow him. 2020 elections.
The allegation, which is of little importance to whether the former president will eventually face criminal prosecution, was made against Eastman’s argument that his summoned communications were protected under the prerogative of a solicitor. However, the commission said that privilege would be lost if the lawyer assisted Trump in illegal conduct.
Eastman denied the allegation, arguing that he was providing legal advice based on his own interpretation of the Constitution, urging then-Vice President Pence to suspend certification.
If Trump is ever forced to defend himself legally in either a civil or a criminal case, he is likely to make similar claims: that his efforts to overthrow the election were backed by advice he had received that such actions were legal.
However, Brooks’ claim could undermine this, as it shows that Trump continued his campaign after leaving office and long after he could claim his stay in the White House.
While it could also prove useful for the jury’s efforts to enforce its summonses in court, Levinson said the latest news merely reinforces a vast record that supports the committee’s investigation base and its power to pursue it.
“How many different chapters of the story that say almost the same thing will we have before we close the book?” said Levinson.
