The commission issued the recommendation Monday night to file charges against Dan Scavino, a former deputy chief of staff for communications, and Peter Navarro, a former trade adviser. If the Plenary Session also criticizes the men, it will be the third and fourth such recommendation to the Ministry of Justice to file charges against aides who defied the committee by refusing to appear for testimony or provide documents. So far, however, Justice has only filed charges against the former White House general, Steve Bannon, Steve BannonJan. 6 votes of the committee for the promotion of the contempt proceedings for Navarro, the Scavino House. On January 6, the committee despises Navarro’s Scavino, Defense and National Security – Biden gathers with allies in Europe MORE. While Bannon’s trial is set to begin in June – he faces up to $ 200,000 in prison – the Justice Department has not yet acted on a similar report that’s defaming congressional accusations against Trump’s former chief of staff, Mark Meadows, Mark Meadows T. . 6 votes in favor of Navarro’s contempt of court committee Scavino Judicial President calls on Judge Thomas to resign on 6 January. Judge Thomas participates in oral hearings remotely amid ongoing scrutiny MORE. “Attorney General Garland, do your job to do ours,” MP Elaine LuriaElaine Goodman Luria2 dead, 3 injured in shooting outside restaurant and bar in Virginia Fears that time is running out to help Ucra Terms 2022: Is there a red wave building? MORE (D-Va.) Said at a meeting Monday night he was asked to weigh in on the report against Scavino and Navarro. Meadows was convicted by Parliament in December, but the Justice Department needed much more time to consider whether charges would be brought against him. Meadows presents a more complicated case than Bannon, who was ousted from the White House on January 6 and whose claims of being covered by executive privileges were quickly rejected by the department. The Ministry of Justice has no obligation to pursue charges proposed by this House, but the representative Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffJan. 6 votes in the committee to promote the contempt proceedings for Navarro, the leader of the GOP Scavino says that the Republicans will start Schiff from the Intel panel. “The Ministry of Justice has a duty to act on this referral and others we have sent,” he said. “Without the imposition of congressional summonses, there is no oversight, and without oversight, no responsibility – for the former president or any other president, past, present or future. “Without enforcing its legal process, Congress will cease to be an equal branch of government, and the balance of power would be forever altered to the detriment of the American people.” The Ministry of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Scavino was summoned by the commission because of his proximity to Trump on the day of the uprising, as well as his efforts to promote a pro-Trump rally that day and his alleged involvement in multiple election disputes. Navarro has made multiple attempts to promote baseless allegations of electoral fraud in the 2020 race, including working with Bannon to delay congressional certification of results. Both have suggested that their work provides them with executive privileges. But the commission says Scavino must appear to be claiming it on a question-by-question basis, with Navarro’s election efforts far beyond his official capacity. Vice President Liz CheneyElizabeth (Liz) Lynn CheneyJan. 6 votes of the committee to promote the contempt proceedings for Navarro, Judge Scavino decides Trump’s efforts to overthrow the most likely electoral criminal Five proposals from the annual withdrawal of the GOP of the Parliament MORE arguing that the executive privilege is so firmly rejected that it was rejected by the committee should not find a home in the Ministry of Justice, which has often been seen as a protector of the executive. “The leadership of the ministry should not apply any immunity doctrine that could prevent Congress from revealing and fully addressing the causes of the January 6 attack,” he said. However, some members of the committee hoped that more accusations could be made. “They acted in Bannon, right? They obviously did not do it in Meadows. Our job is to help make the case, and that is the point of the contempt report. This we can control. “What happened today in that room was about Navarro and Scavino and they helped settle the case and make the case so that Congress can act and the Department of Justice can act.” Pete AguilarPeter (Pete) Ray AguilarHouse. Daylight Saving Time – Witnesses will be invited by NBC to a media dinner later on Jan. 6 Democrats seek relief from COVID after members’s own uprising MORE (D-Calif.) Said. “And if we do our job, we believe that will happen.”
