This comes after Brexit Minister Jacob Rees-Mogg said he supported “the exploitation of every last cubic inch of gas from the North Sea” on the day the report was released. While the report warned that global emissions must peak by 2025 to prevent the worst effects of the climate crisis, which would require decisive and immediate action by all countries, scientists say they are concerned that the UK government is dragging its feet. her feet. Dr Jem Woods, Interim Director of the Center for Environmental Policy at Imperial College, said: “Specifically, the Local Plan 2030, which encourages new construction, has not taken into account the effects on the climate. We can also see similar issues with the Law on the Environment. “New homes under construction over the next 10 years will lock in infrastructure investment for decades to come with significant consequences for remodeling,” according to Ajay’s [Gambhir] It means that heat pumps are not offered instead of gas boilers “. On Monday, Rees-Mogg told LBC radio: “We have to think about exploiting every last cubic inch of gas from the North Sea. “This is not a pure zero tomorrow – 2050 is a long way off.” In response to Rees-Mogg’s comments, Ajay Gambhir, a senior fellow at the Imperial College London Grantham Institute for Climate Change and the Environment, warned: we are seeing a translation of this into field measures fairly quickly. “ He added that the government’s actions are unlikely to achieve its own carbon reduction targets, let alone those set by the IPCC. “Utilities are still contacting me about replacing my gas boiler with a new gas boiler – without mentioning heat pumps. Will this approach allow 600,000 new facilities per year by 2028, as the government hopes? “Subsidies for electric cars, 4.5 4,500 a few years ago, are now 00 1,500 and now only for those under χι 32,000, while subsidies for home chargers are also going to be cut. “The government’s clean zero strategy in the autumn of 2021 has many good ideas for the development of renewable energy sources, hydrogen, carbon sequestration, low-carbon heating, transport and industrial production. “But there is essentially nothing about behavioral changes, e.g. on diets and aviation. And the full implementation of the policies by 2024 (as proposed by the Climate Change Committee) seems questionable. “ Campaigners said cabinet ministers did not appear to be taking the IPCC report seriously. Philip Evans, an oil and gas activist at Greenpeace UK, said: “As the UN describes further investment in fossil fuels as political and economic madness, the Brexit minister wants to double. “This is very silly as it takes an average of 28 years to bring new oil and gas fields to the internet. And even then, the oil and gas they extract do not stay in the UK, they are mostly sold in the international markets to the highest bidder, doing nothing for the household accounts in the UK. “Right now, oil and gas companies are reaping the benefits of wartime price increases, but the government is refusing to impose an unexpected tax that could help reduce the cost-of-living crisis for the most vulnerable.” Gambhir added: “It seems strange to support industries whose emissions are increasingly uncompetitive with new green energy sources such as solar and wind energy. “The North Sea oil and gas assets belong to private, international companies that sell to global and regional markets to maximize their profits. “Large oil and gas companies have benefited from huge tax breaks in recent years, amounting to almost 14 14 billion in new exploration, production and decommissioning, as the North Sea becomes a source of higher costs, a declining and non-competitive source.” Ministers were also divided over the issue of wind farms. Kwasi Kwarteng, the secretary of operations, and Michael Gove, the secretary of the rank, are in favor, but others, including Grant Shapps, the secretary of transport, have called the land turbines “madness in the eyes.” The report, as it is intense, was weakened after the intervention of Saudi Arabia, according to Climate Home. Following a suggestion from the major oil producer, sources told the site that references to carbon capture technology had been added. These methods remain unproven on a commercial scale, but could give the fossil fuel industry a break. Compared to previous drafts, references to the removal of coal, oil and gas have been termed “uninterrupted” and “fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage” have been identified as a way to reduce global emissions according to global .
